Article Information

  • Title: Effect of Heat Treatment around the Fruit Set Region on Growth and Yield of Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai]
  • Authors: Jaejong Noh, Jeong Man Kim, Sameena Sheikh, So Geun Lee, Jeong Hyeon Lim, Moon Ho Seong, & Gi Tai Jung
  • Published: 15 August 2013
  • Journal: Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
    • Volume: 19
    • Issue: 4
    • Pages: 509-514
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0174-6

Research Background


A. Research Context


  • Watermelon requires a long, warm growing season, grows best under temperatures of 21-29°C (tolerating min. of 18°C and max. up to 31°C), and the seed germinates after 4-8 days at a temperature of 25°C.
  • C. lanatus is very sensitive to low temperature (cannot survive at 1°C, the growth stops at 10°C, and do not flower at below 13°C) and low light intensity (min. of 1,200 h of sunlight).
  • Average vegetation period in South Korea is 135 days, that means watermelon can be planted at the beginning of May and harvested around 20 June.
  • The optimum and minimum temperatures for stable fruiting of watermelon cannot be met in April, without heating from external sources.

B. Knowledge Gap


  • There are many methods of heating have been attempted in different crops, but not in watermelon.

C. Research Objectives


  • Study the effect of modulating temperature on growth and fruit characteristics of watermelon.
  • Estimate cost efficiency based on the electric power consumption for heating.

Materials and Methods


Experimental Setup


  • Watermelon cultivar 'Sambok-gul'
  • Watermelon sown on perlite beds in a plastic house under controlled conditions.
  • Locations: Watermelon Farm, Jeongeup-Jeonbuk.
  • Total of 15 plants each were randomized.
  • 3 treatments:
    • Control
    • 14°C
    • 18°C
  • 3 replications.
  • Spaced 45 cm and row length was 3 m wide.
  • Temperature treatments were given around the fruiting region.

Data Collection and Analysis


  • The data collected are:
    • Length of the 1st cotyledon to the 20th node
    • Stem thickness at the fruit set node
    • Leaf length
    • Leaf width
    • Petiole length
    • Fruit length
    • Fruit width
    • Leaf area
    • Number of fruit set nodes
    • Fresh fruit weight
    • Soluble solid content
    • Ca2+
    • Mg2+
  • Mean analysis to compare the effects of treatments using SAS software.
  • The daily low temperatures prior to and after fruit set were recorded from 30 March to 21 April (Table 1).

Table 1. Changes in low temperature prior to and after fruit set during 2010-2011 in control, 14°C, and 18°C.
20102011
Control14 °C18 °CControl14 °C18 °C
30-Mar6.312.515.910.113.013.2
31-Mar11.713.818.49.811.011.4
01-Apr8.013.818.39.910.511.4
02-Apr6.011.1z13.1z14.014.014.9
03-Apr5.211.313.614.113.915.7
04-Apr5.311.914.411.411.813.2
05-Apr13.314.418.89.4211.811.8
06-Apr10.416.018.39.311.311.9
07-Apr5.912.014.515.815.016.1
08-Apr6.412.513.815.114.616.7
09-Apr11.813.219.213.713.315.8
10-Apr12.213.818.010.910.913.9
11-Apr13.714.718.215.214.116.4
12-Apr16.316.819.414.714.416.6
13-Apr7.414.115.710.311.412.3
14-Apr6.414.015.411.414.414.4
15-Apr4.9z13.718.08.017.918.3
16-Apr7.513.515.414.215.315.3
17-Apr6.314.414.610.010.914.4
18-Apr10.114.918.015.915.917.3
19-Apr14.016.018.09.410.911.9
20-Apr11.412.617.08.9z9.6z9.0z
21-Apr13.814.918.0
z values represents the minimum temperature in control, 14°C, and 18°C during the year 2010-2011.

Results & Discussions


1. Growth Characteristics at 15 Days after Fruit Set and at Harvest


Table 2. Growth characteristics during 15 days after fruit set and harvest stage in control, 14°C, and 18°C
TemperaturePlant height
(cm)
Number of
fruit set node
Length of 1st
cotyledon to
20th node (cm)
Stem thickness
of fruit set
node (cm)
Fresh
weight (kg)
Leaf
length (cm)
Leaf
width (cm)
Petiole
length (cm)
Leaf area
(cm2)
Fifteen days after fruit set
Control406.6az21.0a194.1b7.1b1.4b30.0a29.4a18.2a309.3b
14 °C424.5a21.2a209.3b8.5a1.9a32.3a31.7a20.3a355.3a
18 °C430.6a20.5a226.4a7.9a1.7a32.5a30.3a19.7a346.8a
Harvest stage
Control543.4az20.1a201.9ab7.7a1.5b31.0b29.4b20.0a295.8b
14 °C546.1a19.9a194.4b8.6a1.9a30.6b30.2b19.6a300.8b
18 °C557.0a20.7a210.5a8.1a2.0a32.6a33.7a20.8a351.7a
z Means followed by identical letter(s) in a column were not significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT

  • Stem thickness of fruit set node (8.5 mm per plant), fresh weight (1.9 kg per plant), and leaf area (355.3 cm2 per plant) were observed significantly different and higher in 14°C treatment (Table 2).
  • Length of 1st cotyledon to the 20th node (210.5 cm per plant) was found significantly higher at 18°C (Table 2).
    • Increased shoot growth is considered as a parameter for the shoot demand for nutrients uptake (positive impact).
  • In particular, larger leaf area (351.7 cm2 per plant) was found at 18°C (Table 2).
    • Larger leaf area might happen due to increase in leaf length and leaf width.
  • Fresh weight was found significantly higher in temperature treatments (2 kg per plant [18°C] and 1.9 kg per plant [14°C]) than control (1.5 kg per plant).
  • Temperature treatments had non-significant effect on plant height, number of fruit set nodes, and petiole length.
  • Temperature treatments had significant effect on most of the growth characteristics, particularly, fresh weight, leaf area, steam thickness of fruit set node and length of the 1st cotyledon to the 20th node starting 15th day after fruit set and at the time of harvest.
    • The modulated temperature treatments significantly affected photosynthetic activity, increase in lateral main shoot length, growth and development of root and shoot, plant height, internode length, number of branches, flower number, leaf number, leaf area, and yield in various crops.

2. Fruit Characteristics at 15th Days after Fruit Set and at Harvest


Table 3. Fruit characteristics during 15 days after fruit set and harvest stage in control, 14°C, and 18°C
Temperature Fruit length (cm) Fruit width (cm) Fruit weight (kg) Soluble solids (Centre) (%)
Fifteen days after fruit set
Control 16.1bz 15.1b 2.3b 4.1a
14 °C 16.5b 15.6b 2.5b 3.8a
18 °C 17.8a 16.6a 3.0a 4.0a
Harvest stage
Control 24.7bz 22.6b 7.1b 10.8ab
14 °C 25.5ab 23.7ab 8.1a 10.6b
18 °C 26.6a 24.0a 8.3a 11.1a
z Means followed by identical letter(s) in a column were not significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT

Figure 1. Fruit set rate in control, 14°C, and 18°C
Figure 1. Fruit set rate in control, 14°C, and 18°C

  • 18°C treatment had significant effect on fruit length and fruit width, resulting in higher fruit weight on the 15th day after fruit set (3 kg per plant) and harvest stage (8.3 kg per plant) (Table 3).
    • Enhancement in photosynthetic productivity due to the positive effect of temperature treatments on leaf area.
  • 18°C treatment had significantly higher soluble solid content (11.1%) at harvest stage (Table 3).
  • 18°C treatment had significantly higher fruit set percentage (96.5%) (Figure 1).
    • Imposing of temperature treatment 18°C had advantage not only in improving cultivar performance in terms of fruit weight on the 15th day after fruit set and at harvest stage, but also the soluble solid content and fruit set percentage at harvest.
    • Temperatures below or above optimum levels may influence higher differences in plant metabolic activities, fruit set, fruit quality, yield, and number of seeds per fruit.

3. Content of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in Leaves of Fruit Set Region


Table 4. Content of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in fruit set region at harvest stage
Leaf position Control 14 °C 18 °C
Ca2+ (mg L−1) Mg2+ (mg L−1) Ca2+ (mg L−1) Mg2+ (mg L−1) Ca2+ (mg L−1) Mg2+ (mg L−1)
1st lower leaf of fruit set node 51.7 8.6 69.4 12 77.9 10.4
Leaf of fruit set node 53.3 6.4 66 10.8 70.9 11.1
1st upper leaf of fruit set node 59.8 5.5 79.3 11.5 69 8.6
Mean 54.9z 6.8b 71.5a 11.5a 72.6a 10.0a
z Means followed by identical letter(s) in a column were not significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT

  • Temperature treatments had accelerated the accumulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions with significant variations in different leaves that emerge from fruit set nodes (Table 4).
  • Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions were higher in the 1st upper leaf of the fruit set node and the 1st lower leaf of the fruit set node, respectively at 14°C.
    • Temperature treatments had higher leaf area, so promoted high photosynthetic activity and transpiration rate, and in return accelerated ion uptake rate.
    • The leaf at the fruit set node is supportive source and increasing fruit size and solid soluble content during harvest stage.
    • Another study:
      • Higher content of Ca and Mg in the leaves at 25°C.
      • Very low or high temperature may decrease various metabolic process in plant tissues, such as nutrient uptake, fluctuation in the anion exclusion volume and exchangeable Ca2+, chlorophyll formation, and photosynthesis.

4. Electric Power Consumption


Figure 2. Electric power consumption in control, 14°C, and 18°C
Electric power consumption in control, 14°C, and 18°C

  • The average integrated power consumption is 21.9 kW with expense of 795.3 Won to maintain the temperature of 14°C.
  • 18°C temperature require higher energy and expense.
  • Both the power consumption and charges were estimated 64% higher in 18°C over 14°C.
  • Every one unit increase in temperature resulted in an increase in power consumption and expense.
  • Usually, a farmer in Korea has an average income (spring season) around 4,635,554 Won in 2011.
    • These additional costs are estimated to be adequate for Korean farmers budget and also has yield benefit.

Conclusion


  • 18°C temperature treatment enhanced good fruit set rate and soluble solid content in the centre part of the fruit.
  • Ca2+ and Mg2+ accumulations were increased in leaves of the fruit set node.
  • 18°C temperature treatment had additional/extra costs for power consumption that considered as affordable and in range for Korean farmer budget.
  • Modulated temperature treatments could be utilized to enhance the fruit yield and quality in the winter watermelon crops (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai).